Category Archives: Chess Studies

[video] Chess Study #6: Hermanis Mattison, 1913

In this video we are going to take a look at an instructive study by Hermanis Mattison. It was composed in 1913. It is similar to Chess Study #5 in the sense that again we see a fight of pawn and bishop against rook, but the theme is slightly different.

How do you like this study? Please leave your comments below.

Click on the moves below to start playing and show a diagram:

[pgn_compat]
[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.10.08”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Hermanis Mattison, 1913”]
[Black “White plays and wins”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes ,Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “3r4/1P6/4K3/8/1k3B2/8/8/8 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “17”]

{In this position it is White to move and win. If you want
to try and find the solution yourself, pause the video for as long as you like.
I will count to three and then show you the solution: 1, 2, 3.  In this
position everything revolves around White’s passed b-pawn. If he can safely
promote it he will win the game. Unfortunately the black rook is defending the
promotion square ready to sacrifice itself once the pawn promotes. On the
other hand it also means that the rook has to stay on the 8th rank, unless it
can give a check and immediately go back afterwards.  Can White succesfully
fight the defending rook? With some fine maneuvers he can!  With such studies
it pays off to begin thinking with the end in mind. Then you know easier what
to aim for. Regardless of whether you found the solution, can you describe in
words the one circumstance in which White can win? How should the pieces be
situated schematically speaking? Well, the one circumstance is the one where –
supported by White’s king – White’s bishop will either land on d8 or on f8
with Black’s rook to the right side of it, blocking the defense of the rook
towards the b8 promotion square. So f.i. the constellation of Kd7 and Bd8 or
Kf7 and Bf8 would do. Note that in the first case a rook check on the seventh
rank (let’s say h7) is answered by a countercheck with Be7 and in the second
case by Bg7 blocking the check and not allowing the rook to go back to h8. In
order to achieve such a position, White must play precisely and forcefully,
also because Black is threatening to bring in another defender with…Kb5. The
first stage should be to deny the rook practically all the squares on the 8th
rank using the combined power of king, bishop and… pawn! Yes, the pawn is
doing his bit by controlling a8 and c8, two light squares. Added to that the
bishop can control two dark squares, let’s say b8 and d8. Finally the white
king can control 3 more squares on the king side on the board. Darn, does this
mean that the rook always has one square available? Yes, that is the case, but
at that very moment the position of the Black king comes in handy, which is
situated on a dark square. With a check and therefore gain of tempo White will
quickly improve his bishop to cut off the Black rook before he knows what hit
him 😉 Funny right, I just used words to describe the process. We will now
break it down into the little bits we call “moves” and see how it works.} 1.
Bc7 {The bishop starts chasing the rook, Black must react.} Rh8 (1… Rf8 $4 2.
Bd6+ Kb5 3. Bxf8 Kb6 4. b8=Q+) (1… Rg8 {We will see what happens after this
in the main line.}) (1… Re8+ 2. Kf7 Rh8 {leads to the main line}) 2. Be5 {
The white bishop improves his position again with gain of time. Now the rook
is denied the h8 square. This is the difference with the starting position
where the bishop is not yet ideally placed on f4; it does not control h8.} Rd8
(2… Rg8 {Again, see the main line.}) (2… Rf8 $4 3. Bd6+) (2… Re8+ 3. Kf7
Rxe5 $2 4. b8=Q+) (2… Rh6+ 3. Bf6) 3. Ke7 {With Black’s rook being denied
the h8 square, now the White king does his but to chase the black rook.  Only
one square remains.} Rg8 4. Kf7 {And again one square is available.} Rd8 5. Bc7
{And again only one square is available. Is Black slipping away every time?}
Rh8 6. Bd6+ {No, now White wins a vital tempo. And with the rook being pushed
around to h8 White can finally set up the well-known blockade between it and
the b8 promotion square with gain of tempo.} Kb5 7. Bf8 {The blockade has been
reached! White is now threatening to promote.} Rh7+ {A spite check.} 8. Bg7 {
And another blockade. Black’s king is now to late:} Kb6 9. b8=Q+ {And White
wins.  Schematic thinking is very typical for endgame play, also when there
are a few more pieces on the board. The technique of thinking with the end in
mind can be very useful. Try to remember and use that next time you play an
endgame.} *
[/pgn_compat]

PGN Notation:

[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.10.08”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Hermanis Mattison, 1913”]
[Black “White plays and wins”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes ,Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “3r4/1P6/4K3/8/1k3B2/8/8/8 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “17”]

1. Bc7 Rh8 (1… Rf8 $4 2. Bd6+ Kb5 3. Bxf8 Kb6 4. b8=Q+) (1… Rg8 2. Kf7) (
1… Re8+ 2. Kf7 Rh8) 2. Be5 Rd8 (2… Rg8 3. Kf7) (2… Rf8 $4 3. Bd6+) (2…
Re8+ 3. Kf7 Rxe5 $2 4. b8=Q+) (2… Rh6+ 3. Bf6) 3. Ke7 Rg8 4. Kf7 Rd8 5. Bc7
Rh8 6. Bd6+ Kb5 7. Bf8 Rh7+ 8. Bg7 Kb6 9. b8=Q+ *

[video] Chess Study #5: Henri Weenink, 1917

In this video I take a look at an instructive chess study by Henri Weenink. It features some fine maneuvers and ways of “eliminating the defender”.

Leave your comments below.

Click on the moves below to start playing and show a diagram:

[pgn_compat]

[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.09.29”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Henri Weenink, 1917.”]
[Black “White plays and wins”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “8/8/P7/4k3/7B/8/1K6/6r1 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “13”]
[EventDate “2014.09.29”]

{In this position everything revolves around White’s passed a-pawn. If he can
promote it he will win the game. Unfortunately the black rook is still kicking
and looking to defend. Moreover, Black is threatening to play 1… Rg7 or g8
and stop the pawn dead in it’s tracks. Can White succesfully fight the
defending rook? With some fine maneuvers he can!} 1. a7 {White starts with
immediately playing out his trump card, forcing Black to defend very directly.
There are only two ways really.} Rg2+ {With this check Black hopes to get his
rook behind the passed pawn on the a-file, so White must get out of check and
guard the a2 square at the same time.} ({The other defense does not work:} 1…
Rg8 2. Bg3+ $1 {this is an important trick and one that is quite common to
regular chess games. The theme is eliminating the defender – in this case the
rook – either by luring it away or blocking:} Rxg3 (2… Kd4 3. Bb8) 3. a8=Q)
2. Kb1 $1 {This precise move secures the win (By the way, Ka1 with similar
ideas as in the remainder of this study also wins, but for esthetic reasons we
will keep the king on the b-file).} ({After the natural but mistaken} 2. Kb3 $2
Rg8 3. Bg3+ Rxg3+ {Black takes the bishop with check!}) {Black has nothing
better then to keep harassing White’s king} 2… Rg1+ {If White’s king now
moves up to the second rank, Black will repeat with Rg2+ and White has not
made any progress since he cannot cross the third rank as we already saw.} {
But now comes the star move really:} 3. Be1 $3 {A fantastic way to defend
against the check and lure the rook into a very unfortunate position, namely
the e-file from where it’s activity is blocked by the black king!} Rxe1+ {
White was threatening to promote the pawn again, so Black must take the bishop.
} (3… Rg8 4. Bg3+) {But now White CAN safely get out of the checks, note
what happens:} 4. Kb2 Re2+ 5. Kb3 {The third rank is accessible now.} Re3+ 6.
Kb4 Re4+ 7. Kb5 {And… ai! Black can no longer give a check or keep the
passed a-pawn from promoting. Als Black cannot set up a stalemate trick f.i.
after White has promoted. Therefore White will queen and will win the
remaining endgame of Q v. R. That is still a difficult task but it is a
theoretical win and not the subject of this post.} *

[/pgn_compat]

PGN notation:

[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.09.29”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Henri Weenink, 1917.”]
[Black “White plays and wins”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “8/8/P7/4k3/7B/8/1K6/6r1 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “13”]
[EventDate “2014.09.29”]

1. a7 Rg2+ (1… Rg8 2. Bg3+ $1 Rxg3 (2… Kd4 3. Bb8) 3. a8=Q) 2. Kb1 $1 (2.
Kb3 $2 Rg8 3. Bg3+ Rxg3+) 2… Rg1+ 3. Be1 $3 Rxe1+ (3… Rg8 4. Bg3+) 4. Kb2
Re2+ 5. Kb3 Re3+ 6. Kb4 Re4+ 7. Kb5 *

[video] Chess Study #4: Abram Gurvich, 1962

In this video I discuss a useful chess study by Abram Gurvich. It was composed in 1962. It shows a nice bit of “strangulation” on White’s part!

Leave your comments below!

Click on the moves below to start playing and show a diagram:

[pgn_compat]

[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.09.25”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Abram Gurvich, 1962”]
[Black “White plays and wins”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “r7/4k2K/1R3p2/1N6/8/8/8/8 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “11”]

{In this position the material balance is in
White’s favor, but not necessarily losing for Black. Black can even give up
his f-pawn and thearetically draw the endgame of R+N v. R, were it not for the
fact that for the moment his pieces are in unfortunate positions. What White
must do is to put Black’s pieces in passive positions, keep them there and
strangle them even further. Then he has a chance of winning, because in the
end Black will run out of safe moves and then “Zugzwang” (a useful endgame
weapon) will do him in. For those of you who don’t know, “Zugzwang” is the
situation where every legal move you can make only makes your position worse.}
1. Rb7+ Kd8 (1… Ke6 2. Nc7+ {loses the rook.}) (1… Kf8 2. Nd6 {and mate on
f7 will follow.}) (1… Ke8 2. Nc7+ {again loses the rook.}) 2. Na7 {
Completely stalemating the rook, so Black has to move either the king or the
pawn.} Ke8 {The toughest defense.} (2… f5 $2 3. Rg7 {and White will win the
rook with Rg8+ and be able to stop Black’s passed pawn.}) 3. Kg8 {also
starting to stalemate the Black king! Now the threat is Nc6 and mate on e7.}
Kd8 {Again the toughest defense.} ({The win is easy after:} 3… Rd8 $2 4. Nc6
Rd7 5. Rb8+ Rd8 6. Rxd8#) 4. Kf7 {Simultaneously closing in even more on the
Black king and also attacking the f-pawn. Black can now only move his pawn.} f5
5. Re7 {Threatening to win Ra8 with Re8+ supported by Kf7. Black now really is
in “Zugzwang”.} Rb8 {Hoping to answer Re8+ with Kc7 but now the final blow
comes from the knight.} (5… f4 6. Re8+) 6. Nc6+ {winning the rook and the
game!} (6. Re8+ $4 Kc7 $10 {and Black escapes!}) *
[/pgn_compat]

PGN notation:

[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.09.25”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Abram Gurvich, 1962”]
[Black “White plays and wins”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “r7/4k2K/1R3p2/1N6/8/8/8/8 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “11”]

1. Rb7+ Kd8 (1… Ke6 2. Nc7+) (1… Kf8 2. Nd6) (1… Ke8 2. Nc7+) 2. Na7 Ke8
(2… f5 $2 3. Rg7) 3. Kg8 Kd8 (3… Rd8 $2 4. Nc6 Rd7 5. Rb8+ Rd8 6. Rxd8#) 4.
Kf7 f5 5. Re7 Rb8 (5… f4 6. Re8+) 6. Nc6+ (6. Re8+ $4 Kc7 $10) *

[video] Chess Study #3: Richard Reti, 1921

In this episode of Chess Studies I take a look at the mother of all chess studies.

As always, leave your comments below!

[pgn_compat]

[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.09.03”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Richard Reti, 1921”]
[Black “White plays and draws”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “7K/8/k1P5/7p/8/8/8/8 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “11”]

{It seems as if White’s king can no longer stop Black’s passed h-pawn
and that Black’s king in the meanwhile can control White’s passed c-pawn. But
with some beautiful counterintuitive geometrics, White shows that (in contrast
to mathematics) in chess diagonal lines are equally long as vertical or
horizontal lines.} 1. Kg7 $1 {White’s king goes to the most flexible square
from where it can react perfectly in response to whatever Black chooses to do
next.} h4 {Black runs for the hills!} 2. Kf6 $1 {White keeps walking
diagonally!} Kb6 {Black tries to be smart now and tries to eliminate White’s
counterchance, the c-pawn.} ({If Black keeps running then White will be able
to support his c-pawn:} 2… h3 3. Ke6 h2 4. c7 Kb7 (4… h1=Q 5. c8=Q+ $10) 5.
Kd7 h1=Q 6. c8=Q+ $10) 3. Ke5 $1 {But again White moves diagonally!} h3 (3…
Kxc6 4. Kf4 $10) 4. Kd6 h2 5. c7 h1=Q 6. c8=Q $10 *

[/pgn_compat]

PGN notation:

[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.09.03”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Richard Reti, 1921”]
[Black “White plays and draws”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “7K/8/k1P5/7p/8/8/8/8 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “11”]

1. Kg7 $1 h4 2. Kf6 $1 Kb6 (2… h3 3. Ke6 h2 4. c7 Kb7 (4… h1=Q 5. c8=Q+ $11
) 5. Kd7 h1=Q 6. c8=Q+ $11) 3. Ke5 $1 h3 (3… Kxc6 4. Kf4 $11) 4. Kd6 h2 5. c7
h1=Q 6. c8=Q $11 *

[video] Chess Study #2: Ladislav Prokes, 1944

In this episode of I discuss a famous study by Ladislav Prokes.

As always, leave your comments below!

[pgn_compat]
[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.08.29”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Ladislav Prokes, 1944.”]
[Black “White plays and wins”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “8/1P6/p1p5/2R5/k7/P7/1r6/3K4 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “9”]

1. Rc4+ Kxa3 (1… Ka5 2. Rb4) 2. Rc3+ Ka4 (
2… Ka2 3. Rc2) 3. Rc1 $1 {The beautiful point, Black has no good way to stop
White’s idea of Ra1+ pushing Black’s king to the b-file from where it would
block Black’s rook after which the passed pawn can promote.} Rxb7 4. Ra1+ Kb5
5. Rb1+ {And White wins the black rook. Note how black’s pawns are in the way
of his king, which cannot move backwards to protect his rook on b7.} *
[/pgn_compat]

PGN notation:

[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.08.29”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Ladislav Prokes, 1944.”]
[Black “White plays and wins”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “8/1P6/p1p5/2R5/k7/P7/1r6/3K4 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “9”]

1. Rc4+ Kxa3 2. Rc3+ Ka4 3. Rc1 Rxb7 4. Ra1+ Kb5 5. Rb1+ *

 

[video] Chess Study #1: Jindrich Fritz, 1965

Hi all,

I have decided to start a new series on chess studies.
Chess studies are an excellent way to train your thinking, visualization and calculation skills.

A chess study is a chess puzzle where White either wins or draws.
It normally resembles a position from a practical game of chess which is the greatest advantage of a chess study over it’s somewhat more artificial brother the chess problem.

In the title of the post I will mention the composer of the study and the year in which it was composed.

As always, leave your comments below!

[pgn_compat]
[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.08.19”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Jindrich Fritz, 1965.”]
[Black “White plays and draws”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes,Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “5k1K/3R2pp/5qP1/8/8/8/8/8 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “3”]

1. Rf7+ Qxf7 {this is the only move really.} (1… Ke8 $4 {simply loses:} 2.
Rxf6 gxf6 3. g7 $18 {and White promotes.}) 2. gxh7 {and stalemate is
unavoidable!} *
[/pgn_compat]

PGN Notation:

[Event “?”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2014.08.19”]
[Round “?”]
[White “Jindrich Fritz, 1965.”]
[Black “White plays and draws”]
[Result “*”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[SetUp “1”]
[FEN “5k1K/3R2pp/5qP1/8/8/8/8/8 w – – 0 1”]
[PlyCount “3”]1. Rf7+ Qxf7 {this is the only move really.} (1… Ke8 $4 {simply loses:} 2.
Rxf6 gxf6 3. g7 $18 {and White promotes.}) 2. gxh7 {and stalemate is
unavoidable!} *