Category Archives: General

IGM Karel Van der Weide And The Need For Speed

karel-boekAfter IGM Karel van der Weide wrote “Chess for housewives” (Schaken voor huisvrouwen – Arbeiderspers, 2008) we have had to wait a few years for a new publication. It had always been in the pipeline, but when the new Belgium publishing house ThinkersPublishing appraoched IGM Van der Weide and asked him to write his chess technical memoirs, things got new momentum. Well, I can tell you the waiting has been worth it.

“A chess life in 100 games” (Een schaakleven in 100 partijen / language: Dutch / ThinkersPublishing, 2015) is an interesting and hefty volume filled with analysis and interesting chess stories. Van der Weide, sometimes dubbed “The Dutch Tal”, has divided the book into four sections:

  1. White repertoire
  2. Black repertoire
  3. On the road
  4. Combinations

IGM Van der Weide is a modest man and introduces himself and his career cautiously. Although it may be true that he has never reached the highest echelons of chess, it becomes apparent from many of his games that Van der Weide was and still is a very dangerous chess grandmaster with a clear and uncompromising style of play. Many world renowned grandmasters have had to experience this the hard way. Just to name a few: Vladimir Epishin, Tiger Hillarp-Persson, Simen Agdestein, Vasilias Kotronias, Vlastimil Hort and Lubomir Ftacnik.

Van der Weide also mentions that he has had the good fortune to train with some very experienced chess players, most notably Genna Sosonko and Yasser Seirawan. Also many Dutch chess players have had an important influence on Van der Weide’s chess development and he gives credit where credit is due.

Playing Style

When Karel became serious about chess as a profession, he realized that he had to switch opening gears. Whereas he had mostly been playing 1.e4 followed by some sort of king side fianchetto, he understood that in order to have a better chance of opening advantage at the higher levels, it was imperative to start playing the main lines. In the book he describes how his repertoire changed and which openings became his main weapons. Probably the most notable change was the one from the closed Sicilian to the Open Sicilian and this change enabled him to further define his playing style which I would like to describe as a purely attacking one, fuelled with the need for speed.

Van der Weide, being the IGM that he is, has a very fine feel for the deployment of his pieces and everyone interested in improving his or her opening play should study at least this aspect of his games. Never were Caissa’s golden rules of the opening honored more as in Van der Weide’s games. Karel strives to develop all of his pieces from move one and often prefers to give up material in order to not lose time and invite everybody to the party. To illustrate this, I invite the reader to play through the next two games:

Click on the first move to start playing the game

[pgn_compat]

[Event “Zaandam KNSB”]
[Site “?”]
[Date “2000.??.??”]
[Round “?”]
[White “van der Weide, K.”]
[Black “Klarenbeek, H.”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B82”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[PlyCount “71”]
[EventDate “2000.??.??”]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e6 6. g4 Nc6 7. g5 Nd7 8. h4
Be7 9. Be3 a6 10. Qh5 {The first sign of super speedy and agressive play.} (10.
Qd2 {is more usual.}) 10… O-O {It looks risky to castle into the storm, but
as long as Black makes sure no lines or diagonals are opened permanently
towards his king side, he should be fine.} 11. O-O-O Nxd4 12. Bxd4 b5 {Black
is quick with his counterplay, he threatens b4 with initiative.} 13. e5 $5 {
Van der Weide shows his need for speed! He opens up the all-important diagonal
b1-h7 to blacks king. Black should now look to contain this play. It is funny,
throughout the book Van de Weide refers to his contacts with his colleague IGM
Siebrecht. When one of them had beaten an unfortunate white player that had
played a2-a3 against one of their Sicilian defenses, they would look at each
other in disbelief and utter: “Nothing understood”. It is however in this
exact position (at depth 24) that Houdini thinks it is the best move! However,
out of a 1000 games Van der Weide would not even play that once.} Bb7 {It must
feel great to hit the rook on h1 with tempo.} 14. exd6 {But as almost always,
Van der Weide makes it his religion to stay ahead of his opponents.} Bxd6 (
14… Bxh1 $2 15. dxe7 Qxe7 16. Bd3 g6 17. Qh6 e5 18. Rxh1 exd4 19. Nd5 Qe6 20.
h5 $18 {and Black is toast, since White succesfully opens up lines against
Black’s king.}) 15. Bd3 g6 {The only move, and a good one. That h-file is not
open yet!} 16. Qh6 Bf4+ 17. Kb1 e5 {Just closing the other diagonal as well
before disaster strikes at g7. Houdini considers the position as slightly
favorable for Black, but in a practical game who cares? Black’s king sooner or
later must get the shivers.} 18. Ne2 $5 {A very Tal-like move! With both Bd4
and Rh1 under attack, White decides that Black can only take one piece at the
time and reroutes the one piece that is farthest from the action. The direct
threat is of course Nxf4 and mate on g7.} Bxh1 {No problem, I only need one
rook to mate down the h-file. And thank you for giving up you monster bishop
that had beautiful central control.} 19. Rxh1 (19. Nxf4 Bf3 $15 {(KVDW)}) 19…
Bd2 $2 {Under pressure Black takes a wrong turn.} (19… Nf6 $1 {is a
remarkable move that puts a spanner in White’s works. “The knight is on it’s
way to h5 to help the defense of the black king. It is very difficult to tear
down the defenses (KVDW)”.} 20. f3 {Defending against Ng4 and thereby renewing
the threat of Nxf4.} (20. h5 $4 Ng4 {traps the white queen!}) (20. Nxf4 $4 Ng4
{idem}) (20. Rg1 {Probably best, but it is unfortunate to have to move this
rook away from the h-file.} Nh5 21. Nxf4 exf4 $15 {and remarkably the knight
protects g7!} 22. c3 $17 {but in this case White retains some hopes of
attacking the knight via the d1-h5 diagonal.}) 20… Nh5 21. Bc3 (21. Nxf4 exf4
$17 {and the knight remarkably protects g7!})) 20. Bc3 $1 {Not a very
difficult move, but what a superb deflection method!} (20. h5 $4 Bxg5 {again
trapping the queen.}) 20… Bxc3 21. h5 $1 {Once again the need for speed and
the point of the previous move. White’s rook is eagerly awaiting the “champs
elysees”. Upon closer inspection it is not disrespect for material, it is just
knowing which material (Rh1) to respect the most!} Qe7 {Black prepares to
defend h7 laterally.} 22. Nxc3 {With the absence of Black’s light squared
bishop, new central squares have become available for this knight.} (22. hxg6
$2 {Never take your money out of the bank too soon. First it needs to yield
sufficient interest.} fxg6 23. Nxc3 Qg7 $15 {evicts white’s pieces.}) 22…
Rfd8 $2 {The decisive mistake.} ({best was:} 22… f5 {but after} 23. gxf6 Nxf6
24. hxg6 Qg7 (24… hxg6 25. Rg1) 25. Qh3 $16 {White’s attack rages on.}) 23.
hxg6 (23. Nd5 $6 Qf8 {the point of Black’s previous move.}) 23… fxg6 24. Bxg6
$1 {Tear down the wall!} Nf8 {h7 is now the “last man standing”.} (24… hxg6
$2 {This would finally give White access down the h-file!} 25. Qh8+ Kf7 26.
Rh7+ Ke6 27. Rxe7+ Kxe7 28. Qg7+ $18 {etc.}) 25. Be4 {If nothing else, this
simply threatens regaining the exchange with a winning position.} (25. Ne4 $2
hxg6 26. Nf6+ Kf7 $17 {and the Black king escapes (KVDW).}) 25… Ra7 {Saving
the exchange and overprotecting h7, but…} 26. g6 $5 {here comes Charlie
“Relentless” Van der Weide!} hxg6 (26… Qg7 27. gxh7+ Kh8 28. Qh2 $16 {(KVDW)}
) 27. Qh8+ {Bingo!} Kf7 28. Bxg6+ $1 {Van der Weide plays the reminder of the
attack very  powerfully} Ke6 (28… Kxg6 29. Rg1+ Kf7 30. Rg7+ $18) (28… Nxg6
29. Rh7+ Ke6 30. Rxe7+ $18) 29. Be4 {Preparing for the final encirclement of
the black king.} Nh7 {How nasty, trying to lock in White’s queen.} (29… Kd6
30. Qh6+ Qe6 (30… Kc7 31. Qc6+ Kb8 32. Qb6+ Kc8 33. Bf5+ $18) 31. Qg5 $18)
30. Qxh7 {White decides to get his savings from the bank, by now they have
yielded him enough interest.} Qxh7 31. Rxh7 Rxh7 32. Bxh7 Rd2 (32… b4 33. Ne2
Rd1+ 34. Nc1 Rf1 35. Bd3 Rxf2 36. Bxa6 e4 37. Be2 $18) 33. Bg8+ Kf5 34. a3 Rxf2
35. Bd5 Rd2 36. b4 1-0

[/pgn_compat]

Click on the first move to start playing the game

[pgn_compat]

[Event “Oslo”]
[Site “Oslo”]
[Date “2003.??.??”]
[Round “8”]
[White “Andersen, R.”]
[Black “van der Weide, K.”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “B61”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[PlyCount “64”]
[EventDate “2003.??.??”]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Bg5 Bd7 {In this
system Black aims for quick counterplay on the queenside before classically
developing his king side. For the time being his king is perfectly safe in the
center where he has an extra center pawn.} 7. Qd2 Rc8 8. O-O-O {The most
commonly played and best move, but funnily enough it gives Black a target
already and Van der Weide knows how to target a target.} Nxd4 (8… Qa5 $6 9.
Nb3) 9. Qxd4 Qa5 {In a sense this is a double attack against Bg5 and pawn a2
who’s defender (Nc3) can be eliminated with the typical exchange sacrifice.}
10. f4 Rxc3 11. bxc3 (11. Qxc3 $6 Qxc3 12. bxc3 Nxe4 $15) 11… e5 {
Challenging White’s extended position in the center.} 12. Qe3 $6 {A timid move,
giving Black extra options.} (12. Qb4 {is critical:} Qxb4 13. cxb4 Nxe4 14. Bh4
$14) 12… Ng4 $1 = {Black starts to harass White’s queen who is starting to
feel overworked already.} 13. Qg3 {There are many dark square weaknesses to
cover in White’s camp.} Qa3+ {There was nothing wrong with taking on a2, but
that pawn is not important and harassing the white king is much more
inconvenient for the first player.} (13… h6 $6 14. Be2 hxg5 15. Bxg4 gxf4 16.
Bxd7+ Kxd7 17. Qd3 = {trades too may pieces and spoiles Black’s fun.}) 14.
Kd2 $6 {How much thinking time would have gone into this decision? From here
the white king remains too much within the reach of the black pieces.} (14. Kb1
Qc5 = (14… Be6 $4 15. Bb5+ $18 {(KVDW)})) 14… Qc5 {Black attacks f2 and..
.} 15. Bh4 $2 {White plays reactively.} ({Houdini suggests developing so as
not to get on the backfoot too much:} 15. Bd3 Nf2 16. f5 Nxh1 17. Rxh1 {when
the position is roughly equal since White’s lead in development compensates
for his slightly worse pawn structure. For instance:} h6 18. Be3 Qc7 19. Rb1) {
Van de Weide now finds an absolutely brilliant way to punish White’s last move.
} 15… exf4 $1 {White’s dark squares are laid on the wheel of torture here!}
16. Qxf4 g5 $3 $19 {And after this move we can hear White’s bones crack! A
brilliant way to break down White’s defenses and testimony to Van der Weide’s
need for speed.} 17. Bxg5 {The only move.} (17. Qxg5 $4 Bh6 $19) (17. Qf3 $4
gxh4 $19) 17… Rg8 $1 {Peekaboo! Did I say something earlier about Black
developing his king side?} (17… Nf2 $2 {would be way to naive. Black cannot
expect to cash in without his bishops and rook participating:} 18. Bf6 $1 $14 {
and all of a sudden it is White who controls the dark squares!}) 18. h4 {The
final mistake in difficult position.} ({Tougher, but insufficient in the long
run was:} 18. h3 Qf2+ 19. Be2 (19. Qxf2 Nxf2 20. Be3 Nxh1 $19) 19… Rxg5 20.
g3 (20. Qxg5 Bh6 $19) 20… Bh6 21. hxg4 Rd5+ 22. exd5 Bxf4+ 23. gxf4 Qxf4+ 24.
Ke1 Bxg4 $19) 18… f6 {Farewell poor bishop…} 19. Rb1 fxg5 $19 {The battle
is over and needs no further commentary.} 20. Qf3 gxh4 21. Rxb7 Bh6+ 22. Ke1
Rf8 $6 (22… Qg5 $1) 23. Rb8+ Bc8 24. Bb5+ Ke7 25. Rxc8 Qxc8 26. Qh3 Bg5 27.
Rf1 Ne5 28. Rxf8 Qxf8 29. Be2 Qf4 30. c4 Qd2+ 31. Kf1 Qxc2 32. Qb3 Qxe4 {A
great example of Van der Weide’s playing style. Notice how no time was lost
and every move was a hit. The sequence with exf4 and g7-g5 allowed Black to
also include his king side pieces in the attack.} 0-1

[/pgn_compat]

Out & About

In the third chapter Van der Weide describes the many chess tournaments and adventures that he has experienced abroad. He writes with great admiration about the German speaking countries. Other countries and places are frequently less well off. Van der Weide has a dry and ironic sense of humor and while reading the chapter I found myself laughing or smiling frequently. Especially funny are the sections about his “brother” Eduard.

Being a frequent travel companion of Karel, I want to include the following game from this chapter. I was playing in the same tournament and remember it quite well. Van der Weide qualifies it as “a classic”.

Click on the first move to start playing the game

[pgn_compat]

[Event “Senden”]
[Site “Senden”]
[Date “2004.??.??”]
[Round “3”]
[White “Beutelhoff”]
[Black “van der Weide, K.”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “A31”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[PlyCount “52”]
[EventDate “2004.??.??”]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. Nf3 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e5 5. Nb5 d5 {The mst common way to
play this position, Black aims for… you have quessed it, quick development.}
6. cxd5 Bc5 (6… Nxd5 $4 7. Qxd5 Qxd5 8. Nc7+ Kd8 9. Nxd5 $18) 7. e3 O-O 8.
N5c3 {Beutelhoff knows his theory as well.} Bf5 9. Be2 Nbd7 {Voila, all the
light pieces are developed. Next phase is all about the heavy pieces. Compare
white’s development. Yes he has a pawn, but so many of Van der Weide’s
opponents have enjoyed extra pawns…} 10. g4 $6 {White feels he has to “do”
something. Maybe he felt that with the bishop temporarily running short of
squares it has become a target worth pursuing. But losing more time just to
secure an inactive pair of bishops? The move is theoretically still quite
known but Van der Weide wonders if this can a correct approach.} (10. Nd2 {
This more normal approach should be preferred.}) 10… Be4 {Keep it central.} (
10… Bg6 11. h4 $5) 11. Bf3 {Probably not what White intended when he opted
for g2-g4, but at least now he gets some development of his own by forcing
Black to “pull” the queen to f3.} (11. Nxe4 Nxe4 {invites the knight to e4 and
opens up the diagonal to h4 for Blacks queen. A dangerous proposition with no
development whatsoever.}) 11… Bxf3 12. Qxf3 {How should Black continue now?
Of course the rooks can go to their traditional squares on c8 and e8, but what
about the knights and the queen? In that respect Black’s position is still a
bit clutterd up.} e4 $1 {Who needs pawns? Squares, open files and diagonals
are more important.} 13. Nxe4 Nxg4 $1 {Wow, another igniting move! Sometimes
the best way to activate a rook is not by moving it schoolishly to an open
file, but making it work from where it currently is!} 14. Qxg4 f5 {Regaining
the piece and creating a beautiful view for the rook on f8.} 15. Qg2 (15. Qg5 {
to possibly exchange queens was more prudent:} fxe4 ({Or the more Van der
Weide-like:} 15… Be7 16. Qg2 fxe4 {with remaining chances for an attack.})
16. Qxd8 Raxd8 17. Nc3 $15) 15… fxe4 16. Qxe4 {The alternatives are not
better:} (16. Nc3 Qh4 17. Rg1 (17. Qxe4 $2 Qxf2+ $17) (17. Nxe4 $2 Ne5 $17)
17… g6 18. Bd2 Rae8 {and White still cannot castle into safety because of f2.
}) (16. Rg1 Qf6 17. Nc3 Rae8 18. Bd2 (18. Nxe4 $2 Rxe4) 18… Ne5 {and Blacks
pieces swirm in.}) 16… Qg5 (16… Qf6 $2 17. Qe6+ =) 17. h4 {White already
has to resort to this counterattack.} (17. Nc3 $2 Rae8 18. h4 (18. Qc2 Qg2 $19)
(18. Qd3 Ne5 $19) 18… Qh5 19. Qc2 Ne5 20. Qe2 Qg6 $19) 17… Qh5 18. Nc3 $2 {
The decisive mistake, but an understandable one. By move 18 White must have
felt it was high time to start developing.} (18. Qe6+ {was toughest, forcing
Black to solve some coordination issues:} Rf7 19. Nc3 Nf6 {threatening Re8 etc.
}) 18… Rae8 19. Qg2 $2 {Now, the end will come quicker.} (19. Qc4 {Preparing
to offer a queen exchange was tougher:} Ne5 20. Qe2 (20. Qxc5 $4 Nd3+ $19)
20… Qg6 {but with a check coming on d3, White’s position remains in a
shambles.}) 19… Ne5 {Yihaa, everybody is joining he party! Black is down 2
pawns, but his piece deployment is a feast for the eye.} 20. Kd2 {White
anticipates a kngith check.} Ng4 {Zooming in on the f2 weakness.} 21. Nd1 (21.
Rf1 Rxf2+ 22. Rxf2 Bxe3+ {should do the trick.}) 21… Bb4+ {The king hunt
starts.} 22. Kc2 Qf5+ 23. Kb3 Qd3+ $1 {A fine bit of calculation. Black can
afford to sacrifice material, the white king is stuck in a mating net.} 24. Nc3
(24. Kxb4 a5+ 25. Kxa5 Qc4 $19 {with Ra8 on the agenda.}) 24… Bxc3 25. Qxg4 (
25. bxc3 Qb5+ 26. Ka3 (26. Kc2 Rxf2+ $19) 26… Rf6 $19) 25… Bd2+ 26. Ka4 b5#
0-1
[/pgn_compat]

Tactical Wizardry

Although the reader can enjoy some fine technical endgames by his hand, Van der Weide prefers to win his games in the middlegame. he very often does so with intricate combinations. In the last chapter Van der Weide adds a few in the form of puzzles. From that section I have chosen the following one and I invite you to leave a message with the solution!

kvdw-puzzle
White to play and win

How To Get The Book

I have enjoyed reading Karel’s stories and playing through his games. I have learned a lot about piece development, deployment and attacking chess. All in all I would say: recommended reading and kudos to both the author and publisher!

Interested readers can purchase the book using one of the following resources:

http://www.thinkerspublishing.com/authors/karel-van-der-weide/

http://www.debestezet.nl/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=45_50_56&products_id=2976

Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (6): Can Vachier-Lagrave Beat Carlsen?

In a previous article Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (5): Can Topalov Beat Carlsen?, I discussed the likelyhood of Topalov beating Carlsen during the upcoming Sinquefield Cup. In this follow-up I want to take a look at the number six on the starting list, Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, or “MVL” for friends.

Statistics

In the database I found only 5 encounters in classical chess between Magnus Carlsen and Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. In the overall head to head Vachier-Lagrave is behind with 40%, but with so little data, there is no real pattern yet. With two draws he has beaten Carlsen once, whereas Carlsen has beaten him twice.

Last Encounter

The last encounter in a classical game between the two is from a while back. It was played in 2011 in Biel. I will annotate the game below.
Click on the moves below to start playing and show a chess board:

[pgn_compat]
[Event “Biel Accentus”]
[Site “Biel”]
[Date “2011.07.28”]
[Round “9”]
[White “Carlsen, Magnus”]
[Black “Vachier Lagrave, Maxime”]
[Result “1/2-1/2”]
[ECO “D79”]
[WhiteElo “2821”]
[BlackElo “2722”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[PlyCount “97”]
[EventDate “2011.07.18”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “10”]
[EventCountry “SUI”]
[EventCategory “19”]
[Source “ChessBase”]
[SourceDate “2011.09.16”]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. Nf3 c6 6. Nc3 d5 7. cxd5 cxd5 8. Ne5
{We have entered the realms of the Neo-Grunfeld Variation, a system much
favored by Karpov. I recall a magnificent game that Karpov won against Kamsky
back in 1992, a game that he analyzes together with GM Henley in a very
interesting video that I will post at the bottom of this post. Truly one of
the greatest positional masterpieces in the history of chess!} e6 9. O-O Nfd7
10. f4 Nc6 11. Be3 Nb6 12. Bf2 Bd7 13. e4 Ne7 14. Nxd7 $5 {Throughout the
years, theory has evolved enormously and the players are still following the
main book line. In 2011 Carlsen was clearly less inclined to leave the well
trodden paths quickly. By now (2014) there are no less then 43 games in the
database with this exchange! The text move has it’s pros and cons. It does
exchange the well-placed Ne5 for the technically bad Bd7, but aims to gain
space and attacking chances on the king side, similar as to the Karpov game.
The bishop pair is also gained, but that is of rather academic value in this
closed position.} Qxd7 15. e5 {The space gaining follow-up which also renders
Bg7 quite passive.} Rac8 {Black is first on the c-file, but White is happy to
have his knight on c3 (instead of d2 or b3) from where it firmly blockades the
c-file. This is something we already learn from Capablanca and the likes.} 16.
Qe2 Rc4 17. Rfc1 Rfc8 18. Bf1 {Due to the closed nature of the position the
bishops need a lot of rerouting.} R4c7 19. Qe1 {possibly intending Nb5-d6} a6 {
Black puts a stop to that.} 20. b3 {Another point of Qe1 is that now Nb6 can
be denied the c4 outpost.} Bf8 $10 {Black also reroutes, the position is equal.
} 21. Qd2 Nc6 22. a3 f5 $6 {A remarkable move, it seems that White is the only
one who can hope to gain from opening it up a bit.} 23. Kg2 $6 {But Carlsen
says “No, thank you”.} (23. exf6 Qf7 24. Qe3 Qxf6 25. Bh3 {and the weakness of
the e6-pawn gives White something to nibble on.}) 23… Qg7 {I always teach my
students to ask themselves after the opponents move: What has changed in the
position? Well, what do you think has changed in the position after this move?}
24. Be3 Be7 {And after this move?} 25. Bd3 Na5 {And after this move?} 26. Qb2
g5 $6 {Again Vachier-Lagrave plays ambitiously.} 27. Ne2 $1 {Overprotecting f4
and preparing to “vacuum-clean” the c-file.} g4 28. Rh1 $6 {It seemed Carlsen
was building up to something, but now he switches plans.} ({I like} 28. Rxc7 {
Starting to pave the way into Black’s queen side.} Rxc7 29. Rc1 Nc6 (29… Rxc1
$2 30. Bxc1 $14 {when White can try to make use of the three observations you
could make by answering the three change-questions: 1) Qg7 is away from the
queen side 2) Be7 blocks the queens influence on the queen side 3) Na5 is
loose. White is threatening Qc3!} Nc6 (30… Bd8 31. Qc3 Nd7 (31… Qc7 32.
Qxa5) 32. b4 $14) 31. Qc3 $14) 30. b4 {and White is for preference, especially
since now he has the aggressive stance on the c-file and queen side and not
Black.}) 28… h5 29. h3 Kf7 $2 30. Rh2 $6 (30. Bd2 $1 $14 {forcing Black to
block the c-file} Nc6 31. hxg4 Qxg4 32. Ng1 $1 {so as to attack more safely on
the king side!}) 30… h4 31. Bd2 Nc6 32. Rah1 {Funny looking rooks, but what
is White threatening?} Rh8 $6 (32… Rg8) 33. hxg4 Qxg4 (33… fxg4 $4 34. gxh4
$18) 34. Rh3 Rcc8 35. Ng1 $1 $14 {it seems as if White has managed to get some
initiative. he is threatening to step up the pressure with Nf3 or Be2.} Qg7 36.
Nf3 $6 ({More precise is:} 36. Be2 hxg3 $2 37. Bh5+ $16) 36… hxg3 37. b4 $6 {
This plan does not achieve much.} (37. Be2) 37… Rxh3 38. Rxh3 Rh8 39. Rxh8
Qxh8 40. b5 axb5 41. Bxb5 (41. Qxb5 $4 {Maybe this was Carlsen original
intention when he played b3-b4.} Nc4 $1 42. Bxc4 Nxd4 $1 43. Qd7 (43. Nxd4 $4
Qh2+ 44. Kf3 Qf2#) 43… Nxf3 44. Kxf3 Qh2 45. Be3 dxc4 $19) 41… Qc8 $10 {
The position is equal again and a draw is reached soon.} 42. a4 Nc4 43. Bxc4
dxc4 44. Qc1 $5 {A last inventive try to mix it up.} (44. Kxg3) 44… Nb4 45.
Bxb4 Bxb4 46. d5 $5 {The pointe of Qc1.} ({Not the immediate} 46. Qh1 $2 Qc6
$17) 46… Qc5 {No funny business.} (46… exd5 47. Qh1 {would be the other
pointe:} c3 48. Qh5+ Ke7 49. Nd4 c2 50. Qh7+ Kd8 51. Qg8+ Kc7 52. Qxc8+ Kxc8
53. Nxc2 $10) 47. dxe6+ Kxe6 48. Kxg3 Qd5 49. Qb1 1/2-1/2

[/pgn_compat]

Considering the small number of games and the fact that both contenders have not played in over three years, I find it hard so say anything useful about how these two players will compete.

Later today the fun starts.
Let the strongest man win the tournament (and I don’t necessarily mean Carlsen)!

By the way, enjoy the Karpov game:

Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (5): Can Topalov Beat Carlsen?

In a previous article Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (4): Can Nakamura Beat Carlsen?, I discussed the likelyhood of Nakamura beating Carlsen during the upcoming Sinquefield Cup. In this follow-up I want to take a look at the number five on the starting list, Veselin Topalov.

Statistics

In the database I found 17 encounters in classical chess between Magnus Carlsen and Veselin Topalov. In the overall head to head Topalov is the underdog, sofar he scores only 35,3%. He has however beaten Carlsen in a classical game three times, whereas Carlsen has beaten Topalov  eight times. They drew 6 times.

Last Encounter

The last encounter in a classical game between the two was during the Norway Chess tournament earlier this year. I will annotate the game below.

Click on the moves below to start playing and show a chess board:

[pgn_compat]
[Event “Norway Chess 2nd”]
[Site “Stavanger”]
[Date “2014.06.07”]
[Round “4”]
[White “Topalov, Veselin”]
[Black “Carlsen, Magnus”]
[Result “1/2-1/2”]
[ECO “D38”]
[WhiteElo “2772”]
[BlackElo “2881”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[PlyCount “55”]
[EventDate “2014.06.03”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “9”]
[EventCountry “NOR”]
[EventCategory “21”]
[SourceDate “2014.06.18”]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Nf3 d5 5. cxd5 exd5 6. Bg5 h6 {We have
entered the realms of the Ragozin defense.} 7. Bh4 c5 {This move intends to
trade a flank pawn for a white center pawn and also opens up a diagonal for
Qd8.} 8. dxc5 Nbd7 9. e3 Qa5 {This move unpins Nf6 and threatens Ne4.} 10. Nd2
{Unpinning Nc3 and against Ne4} (10. Rc1 Ne4 11. Qxd5 Nxc3 12. bxc3 Bxc3+ 13.
Kd1 {etc. is possible for White, but not to everyone’s liking.}) 10… Bxc3 {
Black takes on c3 to shatter White’s pawn structure before White plays Rc1 and
can recapture on c3 with the rook.} 11. bxc3 Qxc5 {Black regains his pawn.} 12.
Rc1 {And White defends the weakling on c3.} O-O 13. Be2 Qa3 $5 {Magnus
introduces some spice yet again! Normal moves aiming to finish the development
are:} (13… b6) (13… Re8) (13… Ne4 $6 {This try opens up the position too
much.} 14. Nxe4 dxe4 15. O-O Nb6 (15… Ne5 16. Qd4 $14) 16. Qd4 $14) 14. O-O
$5 {With his king safe Topalov does not mind giving a pawn for the initiative.}
(14. Qc2 $6 {is very timid} b6 $10) 14… Qxa2 {And Magnus now consistently
goes for it, what better way to imbalance the game?} 15. c4 $1 $14 {Designed
to make the white pieces spring to life. White has the initiative and in the
future Black will have to safeguard his queen as well as try to finish the
development.} Ne4 $1 {This counterattack on Nd2 is now best. Black wants to
trade pieces after which in the long run his pawns on the queen side become
forces to reckon with. Also, the less pieces, the less White can harass
Black’s queen or otherwise undeveloped position.} ({Naturally Black does not
oblige with:} 15… dxc4 $2 16. Nxc4 $16 {which would already threaten Ra1
winning the queen. Note how the white piece constellation takes away all but
one square from the black queen.}) 16. Nxe4 dxe4 {OK, what should be White’s
plan now? Normally the side with the bishop pair should device a plan
involving the squares complex for which the opponent does not have a bishop,
in this case the dark squares. It would be nice for him to transfer his bishop
from h4 to d4 from where it would aim at all four corners of the board! Most
notably it would attack Black’s king side and defend against Black’s passed
a-pawn.} 17. Be7 {White indeed tries to implement an improvement plan for this
bishop.} (17. Bg3 {was another try to get to d4 in the end.}) 17… Re8 18. Bd6
Nf6 {It is often give and take in chess, now this deployment is possible,
White can no longer double Black’s pawns with Bh4xf6. Bobby Fischer used to
say: “In order to gain a square, you have to give up a square”. The reverse is
also true, c5 has now become available for White’s bishop.} (18… b6 $2 19.
Qd5 $16 {and the dark squared bishop makes it’s influence felt.}) 19. Ra1 $1 {
The rook nudges the queen away and also takes aim at a7 which is on a dark
square(!).} ({To hasty would be:} 19. Bc5 $6 Qa5 20. Bd4 Qg5 $10 {allows for a
nice redeployment of the black queen. From here she defends her own king side
and counterattacks White’s.}) 19… Qb2 $8 20. c5 $6 {Though not without sting,
this move seems to concede any advantage White had left. Maybe Topalov never
considered transfering the bishop to d4 in the first place? The text move
enhances the mobility of Be2 and stifles b7.} (20. Bc5 {threatening Bd4 with a
large advantage would have been consequent and probably the only try for an
advantage:} Qe5 (20… a5 {trying to hang on to the pawn} 21. Bd4 {we have
arrived!} Qb4 $8 22. Qc2 $36 {and White is threatening a very strong
initiative with c4-c5 and Rfb1 etc.} (22. c5 $2 {too early} a4 23. Qc2 Be6 24.
Rfb1 Bb3 $10 {just in time!}) 22… a4 23. Rfb1 Qa5 24. Rb5 $14) 21. Bxa7 {not
a bad pawn to eliminate!} Qg5 {and Black has managed to redeploy the queen,
but at the cost of his passed a-pawn. The black queen would likely get spanked
for such naughty excursions!} 22. Re1 {sidestepping …Bh3 and White retains a
tiny edge.}) 20… a5 {Funny, Carlsen says: my rook on a8 is already developed,
it is supporting my passed pawn so I don’t have to move my bishop to free up
the rook. A bishop which by the way is on an open diagonal already.} (20… Rd8
{with the idea of Ne8 and sidestepping any Bb5’s.}) 21. Rb1 Qa2 $8 {Now Black
always has e6 as a retreat.} (21… Qc3 $4 22. Rb3 $18) (21… Qa3 $4 22. Qd4
$18 {Controlling c3 and the threat of Ra1 is decisive.}) 22. Bb5 Rd8 23. Qc1 {
Threatening Bc4 with advantage.} Qe6 {Too late, the bird has flown.} (23… Be6
{was also possible.}) 24. Bc7 {With a4 in the air and Bd6 being vulnerable to
attack, Topalov decides to take a draw.} Rf8 25. Bd6 Rd8 26. Bc7 Rf8 27. Bd6
Rd8 28. Bc7 {Draw agreed. Not a very entertaining game and an easy draw for
Carlsen.} 1/2-1/2
[/pgn_compat]

Considering their head to head count and the way their last encounter went, I don’t think it is likely that the Bulgarian is going to be a serious threat yet to Carlsen during the Sinquefield Cup.

To be continued…

Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (4): Can Nakamura Beat Carlsen?

In a previous article Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (3): Can Caruana Beat Carlsen?, I discussed the likelyhood of Caruana beating Carlsen during the upcoming Sinquefield Cup. In this follow-up I want to take a look at the number four on the starting list, Hikaru Nakamura.

Statistics

In the database I found 25 encounters in classical chess between Magnus Carlsen and Hikaru Nakamura. In the overall head to head Nakamura is clearly the underdog, sofar he scores only 30%. What’s more, he has yet to beat Carlsen in a classical game, whereas Carlsen has beaten Nakamura no less then ten times!

Last Encounter

The last encounter in a classical game between the two was during the Gashimov Memorial earlier this year. I will annotate the game below.

Click on the moves below to start playing and show a chess board:

[pgn_compat]
[Event “Gashimov Memorial-A”]
[Site “Shamkir”]
[Date “2014.04.27”]
[Round “7”]
[White “Nakamura, Hikaru”]
[Black “Carlsen, Magnus”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “E20”]
[WhiteElo “2772”]
[BlackElo “2881”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[PlyCount “106”]
[EventDate “2014.04.20”]
[EventType “tourn”]
[EventRounds “10”]
[EventCountry “AZE”]
[EventCategory “22”]
[SourceDate “2014.04.30”]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. f3 c5 $5 {The fight has begun! It seems like
Carlsen is saying to Nakamura: Remember our game in Zurich 2014? You could not
convert a similar space advantage after having a huge advantage and even went
on to lose the game. Let’s see how you fare this time.} (4… d5 {is twice as
popular, aimed at preventing White from taking space and forming a broad pawn
center.}) 5. d5 {GAINING SPACE. The position now resembles a Benoni structure,
but with Black’s dark squared bishop on b4 instead of g7. In general Black
needs to play incisive against these structures where White gains some space
in the center, which explains why the King’s Indian and Benoni defenses are
frowned upon by some of the very top players.} O-O {Here or on the next move,
Black may decide to exchange on c3 to saddle White up with doubled pawns and
get an imbalanced game.} 6. e4 d6 7. Bd2 $6 {This is a bit of an insipid move,
but if nothing else, it dissuades Black from exchanging on c3 and (as in the
other games I discuss in this series), it seems that Carlsen’s opponents are
willing to play slightly off-beat moves as well to get Carlsen out of any
preparation he may have done in his sideline.} Nbd7 {White may have more space
and a broad pawn center, but Black has rapid development. Let’s see if and how
he puts that to use.} (7… Bxc3 $6 8. Bxc3 {and White does not have the
doubled pawns.}) 8. Nge2 Ne5 {Question: Speaking of quick development, what
does this move threaten?} 9. Ng3 {Whew! Just in time ;-)} exd5 {OK, the side
with an advantage in development should open up the position. That’s what
Carlsen does.} 10. cxd5 {Off course we can expect a world class grandmaster to
recapture the correct way: towards the center, not exchanging pieces and
keeping the e-file as closed as possible. Now however, b7-b5 becomes a theme.}
(10. Nxd5 $2 {When you have a space advantage it is normally not good to
exchange pieces:} Nxd5 11. cxd5 f5 $1 $15 {And by exchanging off Nf6 Black
immediately gets to activate Bc8 and Rf8 as well.}) (10. exd5 $2 {Opening up
the e-file like this with your king still in the middle is practically suicide.
} Re8 $17 {And in order to stave off the worst, White has to give up his right
to castle with Kf2.}) 10… Bd7 {Carlsen tried to open up the position in the
center, but Nakamura would not quite oblige. In return though he now has a
majority on the queen side and is preparing to make use of it. Other then that,
this move also finishes development. By the way, note that because of the
space disadvantage this bishop has only one square to go to.} (10… c4 $5 {
with the idea of revitalising the dark squared bishop with Bc5 is also
interesting.}) 11. a3 {Nakamura is daring Carlsen to take on c3 or otherwise
retreat his bishop.} (11. f4 $6 {Again because of the space disadvantage and
the new location of Bd7, Carlsen had to seriously reckon with this move:} Ng6
$15 {is fine though, since White is not ready to play e5 or f5 and has
weakened e4 in the process. Re8 is now a nasty threat.}) 11… Ba5 {Every
modern day Grandmaster normally values bishops over knights, but there was a
concrete reason as well, which in chess is always more important than general
rules of thumb.} (11… Bxc3 $6 {with the idea of eliminating a defender of b5
and immediately mobilizing the queen side pawn majority does not quite work
which means that it comes at too high a price (the dark squared bishop):} 12.
Bxc3 b5 13. Qd2 {Preventive medicine against b5-b4 and preparing to  attack on
the newly conquered dark squares with such moves as Qg5 or even take over on
the queen side with the blocking Ba5.} a5 14. a4 b4 (14… bxa4 15. Be2 $14)
15. Bxe5 dxe5 16. b3 $14 {and White has a clear strategic advantage: he has
managed to block Black’s majority, Black has two weak pawns on c5 and e5,
White can attack along the half open d-file and he has a protected passed pawn
on d5. Black does not have much in return. He can possibly get his knight to
d6 and block from there and try for counterplay on the dark squares, but
White’s advantages are more structural and tangible.}) 12. Be2 {White has to
finish development sooner or later.} b5 $1 {Wow, is that possible? Isn’t that
square controlled twice by White?} 13. O-O {Nakamura wisely tries to finish
the opening.} (13. Nxb5 $2 Bxb5 14. Bxb5 (14. Bxa5 $4 Qxa5+ $19 {and Black
protects Bb5}) 14… c4 $1 {The justification, threatening Qb6 as well as Nd3+
making use of White’s inferior development and king safety (compare the note
to Black’s 7th move):} 15. b4 $8 (15. O-O $4 Qb6+ $19 {winning the bishop.})
15… cxb3 {and White’s position remains shaky, he still can’t castle.} (15…
Nd3+ 16. Ke2 $1 Bb6 17. Bxc4 {and White is remarkably safe.} Nf2 18. Qb3 Nxh1
19. Rxh1 $14 {Nonetheless, these lines must be very difficult to navigate for
the players.})) (13. Bxb5 $4 Bxc3 {Eliminating the defender of Bb5} 14. Bxd7
Bxd2+ 15. Qxd2 Qxd7 $19 {and Black remains a piece up.}) 13… c4 $6 {This
move threatens a check on the a7-g1 diagonal, but does give up control of d4.
There were other more flexible moves involving other, still inactive army
units:} (13… a6) (13… Rb8) 14. Be3 $6 {This move does prevent a check but
also allows for a favorable trade of dark squared bishops.} (14. Kh1) 14… Bb6
{Why is this a good move? It comes with tempo, it paves the way for the a-pawn
(a space and hence mobility issue), if the dark squared bishops get exchanged,
White may regret that he put his center pawns on light squares.} 15. Qd2 {A
multifunctional move: it protects Be3, gives the queen a function and connects
the rooks. White has finally finished the opening. Now, let’s give Black one
more move and then determine the outcome off the opening battle.} (15. Bxb6 $6
{would be an amateurish and reactive way to meet the attack on Be3. By trading
(releasing the tension between Bb6 and Be3) White helps Black by inviting the
Black queen to come forward (develop) and that with check.} Qxb6+ 16. Kh1 a5 {
and Black has a fine game.}) 15… Rb8 $6 {After this move the game remains
balanced and the outcome of the opening stage is even, but I find this an
awkward move. All three pieces, Rb8, Bb6 and Qd8 seem to be competing for the
same deployment and could be in each others way. Probably Carlsen thought the
same, but isn’t that his style, to mix it up a bit? Haven’t we seen him play
these slightly less “classical” or obvious moves before? Is he starting to put
thoughts into his opponents head again? Let me quote D.T. Max from an
interview with Carlsen that appeared in the New Yorker, March 2011: “Carlsen
said that, for him, great chess playing is less the scientific search for the
best approaches than psychological warfare with some little tricks.”} (15…
a5 {Would be a good way for Black to continue his middle game. Funnily enough,
he had already finished his opening before White ;-)}) 16. Nd1 $6 {Even world
class grandmasters put knights on the rim, but in these types of positions it
is more common, the position is still quite closed and White may have the time
to do this. That said, what is the concrete idea of this move? It may be that
White wants to exchange Be3 and then transfer this knight via e3 to f5 from
where it could be replaced with the other knight if Black plays Bd7xf5. But
then what? What does that achieve? It will have developed Black’s queen to b6,
lost a few tempi and will have exchanged more pieces. Also Black may play
g7-g6 at some point and simply deny white that square. But what’s more,
something has changed in the position: pawn e4 is less protected, taking the
sting out of a possible f3-f4.} (16. f4 {White is now much better prepared to
play this move.} Ng6 (16… Neg4 $2 17. Bd4 $1 $14 {threatening h3 and making
use of d4.}) 17. Nh5 {and White may try to develop an initiative on the king
side.}) 16… Bc8 $6 {The players exchange “half” moves.} (16… h5 $1 $15 {A
well-known device to play against g3/g6 or b3/b6 knights is to push one’s rook
pawn. Making use of White’s temporary uncoordinated clutter of pieces, this
would have been a nice way for Carlsen to pursue the initiative.} 17. h4 {is
an ugly move to make.} (17. f4 $2 {would no longer be possible, even though it
has not been Nakamura’s intention all along.} Neg4 18. Bxg4 (18. Bd4 $2 h4 19.
Nh1 Nxe4) 18… Bxg4 {and White’s best is to return and protect e4…} 19. Nc3
Re8 $17) (17. Nh1 {was probably not Nakamura’s intention.})) 17. Kh1 {This
prepares the exchange on b6, after which Ne3 would not be pinned.} Nfd7 $6 {So
that was Carlsen’s intention, to also retreat a knight in the hopes of getting
to a better square, but it falls short one tempo.} (17… Re8 18. Bxb6 Qxb6 19.
Ne3 g6 20. b3 {or something to that nature must have been Nakamura’s intention.
}) 18. f4 $1 {With Nf6 no longer attacking e4 and before jumping to c5,
Nakamura quickly changes tack.} (18. Nf5 Nc5 {with the dual threat of Nb3/d3.})
(18. Bxb6 Qxb6 19. Ne3 Nc5 {and Black’s attack on d3 looks stronger than
White’s on f5.}) 18… Ng6 19. Bxb6 $1 {White has some strategic initiative
now and forces to Black to recapture in the least desirable way, making the
earlier deviced plan more feasible.} Rxb6 $8 (19… Qxb6 $2 {The queen should
keep control of f6, that’s the thing.} 20. f5 Nge5 21. f6 Nxf6 22. Rxf6 $1 $18
{and for this demolishment White has his pieces on the right squares.}) (19…
Nxb6 $2 {is similar:} 20. f5 Ne5 21. f6 $16 {with a dangerous attack.}) 20. Ne3
$6 {OK, the knight is on e3 now.} (20. a4 $1 {trying to activate the rook
seemed more precise.}) 20… Nc5 {Carlsen has also managed to reroute his
knight.} 21. Bd1 {The best way to contain Nc5, but putting a bishop on the rim,
may also be dim. It will take this piece a number of moves before it moves to
c2 and connects the rooks again. For the moment however, White threatens f5
again!} (21. f5 $2 Nb3 $15) 21… Nd3 $2 {A bold move which attacks f4, but
loosens control of a4. The knight still feels a bit lonely in it’s endeavours.}
(21… f6 {to stop the white pawn from ever going to f6 was a solid try.}) 22.
f5 {Allowing the black knights some squares.} (22. a4 $1 {Attacking Black’s
structure and introducing some useful tension along the a-file for the rook on
a1.} a6 (22… Ngxf4 $2 23. axb5 Rxb5 24. Nxc4 $16 {and Blacks knights lack
support and hang in the balance.}) (22… Ndxf4 $2 23. axb5 Rxb5 24. Ngf5 {and
White now does in fact have a strong initiative on the king side (Ng6 is
blocking g7-g6 and the strong centralizing Qd4 is threatened).}) 23. Nh5 $14)
22… Ngf4 23. a4 a6 24. Ng4 {Threatening to take on f4! Black faces a bit of
a crisis now.} h5 $8 {As so often a counter attack is the solution.} 25. Nf2 {
Nakamura chooses the positional approach. If he can get rid of the Black
knights in which so much time and energy was invested, then what remains of
Black’s position?} (25. Rxf4 $5 {is the more dynamic try:} Nxf4 (25… hxg4 26.
Rxg4 $14) 26. Nh6+ $1 gxh6 27. Qxf4 $14 {and the Black king is feeling really
uneasy:} Qg5 28. Qf2 Rb7 29. Nxh5) 25… Qf6 {Finally the queen gets some
influence also.} (25… Nxf2+ 26. Qxf2 h4 27. Qxf4 hxg3 28. Qxg3 $14 {and
White has a solid pawn plus advantage, especially since there is no knight
anymore that can sit on e5.}) 26. Nxd3 $6 {Not the strongest continuation.
Nakamura must have been extremely attracted to the ensuing possible
complications, but objectively they are fine for Black and Carlsen always
smells it when something is fishy.} ({Perfectly possible was:} 26. Nxh5 Nxh5
27. Nxd3 cxd3 28. a5 $1 {maybe Nakamura missed this in-between move} (28. Bxh5
$2 bxa4) 28… Rb7 29. Bxh5 $14) 26… Nxd3 27. Qe3 $1 {A superb bit of
calculation by Nakamura nonetheless. Hitting Rb6 and sidestepping a vis-a-vis
after Qb2.} (27. a5 {no longer works:} Rb7 28. Nxh5 Qxb2 $10 {and yummie + a
double attack on Ra1 and Qd2 while keeping g7 defended! Queens…} 29. Qe3 Qxa1
30. f6 Qc1 $1) 27… Rb7 28. Nxh5 Qh6 $1 {But Carlsen is no slouch either, he
does not fall for it (and maybe he did not even bother calculation it,
trusting Nakamura and trying to get ahead on the clock)!} (28… Qxb2 $2 {now
this does not work:} 29. f6 $1 $18 Qxa1 30. fxg7 {with the deadly threat of
Qh6-h8 mate. Note how Bd1 is protected.} Qc1 31. Nf6+ $1 {This is the
difference.} Kxg7 32. Qg3+ Kh6 33. Qh4+ Kg6 34. Qh5+ Kg7 35. Qh7#) 29. Qxh6
gxh6 {So, the smoke has cleared, but how to evaluate this endgame? Well, let’s
weigh it up: in favor of White: he has an extra pawn and Black’s king is less
safe (the combination of f6, Nh5, Rf1 and the missing g-pawn may still
represent some danger). In favor of Black: He has an octopus on d3, the
technically better bishop and a mobile pawn majority on the queen side – note
that White’s pawn majority in the center is useless. In short: Black is by no
means worse and concretely he is threatening to take on b2. It seems that
Magnus has done it again and can grind out an end game! Can Nakamura display
the necessary amount of flexibility to adjust to the new situation?} 30. axb5
axb5 31. Bc2 $5 {The first sign that Nakamura had not completely adjusted to
the new situation yet. The strong and creative player that he is and with time
trouble starting to roar it’s ugly head, he is still intent on finding a way
to attack black’s weak king, even without queens! Note that the bishop move
intends to lure the knight away, connects the rooks and is aiming at the king
side along the b1-h7 diagonal where White may decide to jettison some pawns,
in order to open up that diagonal.} (31. Rb1 {protecting b2, preparing b4 and/
or Bc2 was best.}) 31… Ne5 $2 {Probably sensing that Nakamura wants him to
take on b2 or otherwise take his beautiful knight, Magnus quickly plays on
instinct, but surrenders a tempo that White can use to shore up his poition.
Is Nakamura cool headed enough to find the best moves in time trouble?} (31…
Nxb2 32. Rf3 {may have been Nakamura’s intention:} b4 33. Rg3+ Kh7 $4 (33…
Kh8 34. Ra6 Rd7 $10) 34. Ra6 $1 f6 (34… Rd7 35. Nf6+ $18) 35. Rxd6 $18 {and
White’s strategy succeeds.}) 32. Ra6 {In time trouble most players tend to
play actively.} Rd8 33. Ng3 $6 (33. Kg1 $1 $14 {In retrospect it is easy to
say that black pawn promotion motives are of course enhanced by the weakness
of White’s back rank, but this is a very difficult move to find in time
trouble. Still, nothing wrong with White’s position after the text move.})
33… Rb8 {attacking Ra6} 34. Ra7 b4 {Here they go… very nasty to defend
against them when in time trouble. Is Black going c3 or b3? What to play?} 35.
Ne2 $6 {“Let’s bring the knigh closer, can’t be bad.”} Bd7 {“Hmm, maybe it was
better to play Rb1 on the previous move, after c4-c3 this bishop is going to
hit something on e2 or f1 from b5.”} 36. Rfa1 $6 {“Quickly, let’s move the
rook off that diagonal”. The rooks defend better against a possible free pawn
when they are connected on the first rank.} (36. Rb1 $10) (36. Nd4 $10 {
stopping Bb5.}) 36… Bb5 $1 $15 37. h3 {To answer c3 with Nd4} Rdc8 $1 {But
Carlsen keeps the pressure on. Note how he first brings all his forces into
active positions before playing a pawn break. The threat is stronger than the
execution. Now Nakamura has to think again: how does this rook move change b3
or c3?} (37… c3 38. Nd4 cxb2 39. Rb1 b3 40. Bxb3 Rdc8 $2 41. Rxb2 Rc1+ 42.
Kh2 {and the White king finds shelter.}) 38. Kh2 $2 {And Nakamura goes astray..
. The king was already taken care of by h2-h3, now he should play the rook
move that he needs after both c4-c3 and b4-b3.} (38. Nd4 $2 {This is only good
after c4-c3.} b3 $1 {Now that White no longer controls c3 with his knight,
Black plays the other pawn!} 39. Bb1 (39. Bd1 c3 40. bxc3 b2 41. Rb1 Bd3 $19)
39… c3 40. bxc3 b2 41. R1a5 Bd3 $19) (38. Rb1 {It is quite possible that
Nakamura was afraid of this long and complicated line:} c3 (38… b3 39. Bd1
$10 {and c3 is well controlled.}) 39. Nd4 b3 $1 (39… cxb2 40. Rxb2) 40. Nxb3
Bd3 41. Bxd3 Nxd3 42. bxc3 Rxc3 {attacking the pinned knight!} 43. Ra3 Nc5 {
and again!} 44. e5 $1 {but there is this absolutely crazy and inhuman line
with which White can fight on.} dxe5 (44… Rcxb3 45. Rbxb3 Rxb3 46. Ra8+ Kg7
47. e6 Kf6 48. Rf8 {and a Black win is problematic..}) 45. d6 Kf8 46. Nc1 $1 {
Wow, a discovered attack on both rooks!} Rxh3+ $1 {A desperado!} (46… Rxb1 $2
47. Rxc3 $10) 47. Rxh3 Rxb1 48. Rc3 Nb7 $15 {and Black is on top, but a draw
is quite likely. All of this is of course impossible to see in time trouble,
let alone when you have enough time on the clock…}) 38… c3 $1 $17 {Now
Black just comes out on top.} 39. Nd4 cxb2 40. Rb1 {For the moment Nd4 is
protecting Bc2 right? But…} Rc4 $1 {This is how the rook move had changed
the position! Black attacks the defender of Bc2.} 41. Nxb5 Rxc2 {Now White is
faced with the double attack of Rxb5 and Nf3-d2.} 42. Nd4 Rd2 $2 {This move
endangers the win. As Carlsen said after the game, he was following his
instincts and never even looked at b4-b3.} (42… b3 $1 $19 {is quite an easy
win.}) 43. Nc6 $1 Re8 44. Ra4 $2 {The losing move really, it allows Black a
tempo to activate his knight and attack e4 in the process.} (44. Nxe5 $1 {
exchange that beast!} Rxe5 45. Ra2 Rxe4 46. Raxb2 Rxb2 47. Rxb2 Kg7 $15 {and
if this is winning, Black still has to show a lot of technique.}) 44… Nd3 $19
{The knight returns to it’s dominant position and e4 is lost.} 45. Nxb4 {This
of course was the point of Ra4, but the knight is badly placed here and b2 is
also still on the board.} Nf2 $1 {No exchanging the knights of course!} 46. Ra2
Nd1 {Only for the exchange will you eliminate my free pawn!} 47. Rxd1 Rxd1 48.
Rxb2 Rxe4 {Compared to the single rook endgame, being the exchange up clearly
helps Black ;-)} 49. Nc6 Kg7 50. f6+ Kxf6 51. Rf2+ Kg6 52. Nd8 Re8 $1 {0-1 A
nice trick to finish the game, and here Nakamura resigned due to:} 53. Nxf7
Rxd5 {and White’s knight is trapped.} 0-1

[/pgn_compat]

Considering their head to head count and and the fact that Carlsen seems a bit of an Angstgegner for Nakamura, I don’t think it is likely that the American is going to be a serious threat yet to Carlsen during the Sinquefield Cup. On the other hand, there is a first time for everything, isn’t there?

To be continued…

 

Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (3): Can Caruana Beat Carlsen?

In a previous article Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (2): Can Aronian Beat Carlsen?, I discussed the likelyhood of Aronian beating Carlsen during the upcoming Sinquefield Cup. In this follow-up I want to take a look at the number three on the starting list, Fabiano Caruana.

Statistics

In the database I found 14 encounters in classical chess between Magnus Carlsen and Fabiano Caruana. In the overall head to head Caruana is somewhat the underdog, sofar he scores 42,9%. In 2014 he has been doing less succesfull, out of 5 games he scores 30%. To add to that: stemming from real fights, Carlsen’s wins were chess technically more impressive when compared to Fabiano’s one win in which Carlsen blundered a pawn in quite a silly way, even though Caruana showed good technique in that game to win it.

Last Encounter

The last encounter in a classical game between the two was during the Olympiad in Tromso earlier this year. I will annotate the game below.

Click on the moves below to start playing and show a chess board:

[pgn_compat]
[Event “Tromsoe ol (Men) 41st”]
[Site “Tromsoe”]
[Date “2014.08.08”]
[Round “6.1”]
[White “Caruana, Fabiano”]
[Black “Carlsen, Magnus”]
[Result “0-1”]
[ECO “B01”]
[WhiteElo “2801”]
[BlackElo “2877”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[PlyCount “100”]
[EventDate “2014.08.02”]
[EventType “team-swiss”]
[EventRounds “11”]
[EventCountry “NOR”]
[SourceDate “2014.08.20”]
[WhiteTeam “Italy”]
[BlackTeam “Norway”]
[WhiteTeamCountry “ITA”]
[BlackTeamCountry “NOR”]

1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qd8 $6 (3… Qa5 4. d4 Nf6 5. Nf3 Bg4 6. h3 Bh5 7.
g4 Bg6 8. Ne5 e6 (8… Nbd7 9. Nxg6 hxg6 10. g5 $2 Nd5 $10 {And here to as
opposed to the game, Qa5 helps control d5!}) 9. Bg2 c6 10. h4 Be4 {This is the
difference with the game, Qa5 helps to control e4!}) 4. d4 Nf6 5. Nf3 Bg4 6. h3
Bxf3 {These situations always intrigue me.} (6… Bh5 $2 {In this particular
situation, due to the queen on d8, Black’s position is not ready for this
classical approach of keeping the bishops.} 7. g4 Bg6 8. Ne5 e6 (8… Nbd7 9.
Nxg6 hxg6 10. g5 Nh5 {the d5 square is not available…} 11. d5 $16) 9. Bg2 c6
$2 10. h4 Bb4 {desperately trying to control e4 so the bishop can retreat to
it.} 11. O-O {unpinning} Bxc3 {removing the defender} 12. bxc3 {but it turns
out that Bg6 is in box anyway:} Qa5 {seems best:} (12… Nbd7 $2 13. Qe2 $1 $18
{avoiding the exchange of queens and keeping an eye on all the retreat squares
of Bg6. The threat of h5 is now decisive.}) (12… Be4 $2 13. f3 Bd5 14. c4 $18
{and the poor bishop get’s trapped on d5 as well.}) 13. h5 $6 Be4 14. f3 Qxc3 (
14… Bd5 15. c4) 15. fxe4 Qxa1 16. h6 $1 $16) 7. Qxf3 c6 {Now d4 is
threatened.} 8. Ne2 $6 {Caruana plays a rare move. It has only been played by
Fedorchuk against Danielsen in Calcutta 2014. Again it seems as though
Carlsen’s opponents want to return the favor to Magnus to try and get him out
of the preparation he may have done in the off-beat variations he chooses. As
to the move itself: White has only one problem in the Scandinavian, Nc3 blocks
his c-pawn which in turn means that he cannot set up a pawn duo and control d5.
Another purpose of the move is to reroute the knight to a potentially better
square, from c3 the knight has no “forward” prospects.} (8. Be3 {is the more
logical main move:} e6 9. Bd3 Nbd7 10. O-O-O $5) 8… e6 9. g4 $5 {an
interesting approach to the position. In an ideal world White is contemplating
Bg2, 0-0, c4, Be3, Nf4, Rad1, Rfe1, g5 and d4-d5! OK, just dreaming…} Qd5 {
The return of the queen! Carlsen tries to make use of the few central
possibilities he has before it is too late and White has managed c2-c4 without
a nasty Bb4 check.} 10. Bg2 {White of course keeps the tension.} (10. Qxd5 $2
cxd5 $10 {renders White’s bishop pair useless and Black can start a minority
attack on the queen side. Also White has a weakened king side.}) 10… Nbd7 11.
Qg3 {Starting a cat and mouse game} (11. O-O $14 {is a more logical follow-up.}
Qxf3 (11… Bd6 $2 12. Qd3 $1 {Now this stronger discovered attack is possible,
Bg2 is protected.}) 12. Bxf3 $14) 11… Qc4 {Hmm, this Scandinavian queen has
made some career after all 😉 Nonetheless, she may remain a bit vulnerable
after all.} 12. Qb3 {Caruana’s strategy seems a bit meek to me.} (12. c3 {
trying to use the queen as a target later on was more ambitious.}) 12… Qxb3
$6 {Again Magnus the end game guru is taking a strategical risk (or maybe he is not ready to commit to a woman yet), and again it could be part of
his provocative attitude, keeping the disadvantage within reasonable borders
but trying to give the opponent the feeling that he has some advantage. And
indeed, Caruana starts to think and work hard to “make the best of it” but
loses the game in time trouble.} (12… Nb6 {keeping the tension and thereby
control of c4 was more logical.}) 13. axb3 {Now White has some activity along
the semi open a-file and has recaptured with a pawn towards the center,
increasing his influence there.} Bd6 14. c4 {A long awaited move, rendering
Blacks minor pieces less useful.} a6 15. Be3 (15. O-O {I would have had
trouble figuring out where to put my queen’s bishop and play this more
flexible move instead.}) 15… O-O-O 16. O-O-O {Let the middlegame begin!} Rhe8
{I’m not sure what the rook is doing here, I don’t think e6-e5 is an idea here
since it weakens the light squares.} (16… h5 17. Bf3 (17. g5 Ng8 {and the
knight gets a strong outpost on f5.}) 17… Nf8 {and Black may have introduced
some useful tension.}) 17. Ng3 {I’m also not sure what this knight is going to
do. Caruana probably meant it as prophylaxis against e6-e5 when White could
play Nf5.} (17. Kc2 {freeing up the first rank, protecting the b3 weakness and
keeping flexibility.} e5 $2 18. d5 $1 cxd5 19. g5 Nh5 20. Bxd5 $16) 17… Nf8 (
17… h6 {to cut out any g4-g5’s}) 18. Bf3 (18. g5) 18… Ng6 19. h4 {
Preventing Nh4.} Bf4 $6 {Black wants to break White’s bishop pair, but at the
cost of strengthening his center. Also it seems mistimed, because White now
has a nice forcing line.} 20. h5 Bxe3+ 21. fxe3 Ne7 22. e4 $6 {We, and me
certainly, can’t blame Caruana. He is playing the human stuff!} (22. h6 $1 $14
{and White starts nibbling at Black’s king side.}) 22… h6 {Black prevents h6.
} 23. e5 {It looks impressive what Caruana is doing, he wants to play his
knight to the outpost on d6. But as it turns out, Black has everything under
control and can play around and against that knight! White is actually going
to be a bit overextended.} Nh7 {Eyeing the nice g5 square from where the
knight will have a few functions to perform such as protecting f7.} 24. Ne4 Rf8
{sidestepping the fork.} 25. Nd6+ $6 {It turns out that the knight has trouble
maintaining itself here.} Kc7 $10 {Now the well known antidote with f7-f6,
nibbling at the support of Nd6, is threatened!} 26. Bg2 {The computer does not
care, but to me Caruana plays a bit too reactive and shows a bit too much of
attachment to his bishop (which has been a distinguishing factor for any
advantage he may have had). This bishop is not necessarily such a good piece
anymore. Looking at the king side, it may even be called a “bad” bishop. Black
should probably not trade a knight for it, so why not intice him to do so?} (
26. Kc2 {It’s an endgame, so let’s bring the king closer.} Ng5 27. Rhf1 $1 {
Rooks are stronger than bishops and should be brought into play sooner or
later!} Nxf3 $2 28. Rxf3 $14 {and White sets up nasty pressure on the f-file.})
26… Ng5 27. Rhf1 f6 $1 {True, e6 is now weakened, but how to attack it? With
Bh3 (tongue-in-cheek)?} 28. Kc2 (28. exf6 $2 Kxd6 29. fxe7 Kxe7 $15 {and Black
is enjoying the better minor piece.}) 28… fxe5 29. dxe5 {e5 on the other
hand is also not so easy to attack (yet).} Nc8 $1 {Attacking the intruder and
again striving for N v. B.} 30. c5 {Correct, but weakening d5 in the process.}
(30. Nxc8 $2 Rxf1 31. Rxf1 Kxc8 $15 {Note how Ng5 is protecting f7.}) 30… Ne7
{The knight returns.} 31. b4 $2 {A very human move to make but a mistake
putting the pawn on a vulnerable square, probably due to time pressure.} (31.
Kd2 Nd5 {and White does not have to take on d5.} 32. Bxd5 $2 cxd5 $15) (31. Ra1
) 31… Nd5 {Ai, a double attack against b4 and… e3!} 32. Bxd5 {White is
practically forced to exchange bishop for knight which, as mentioned earlier,
is in itself not so bad, but this particular capture brings about a very
favorable change in the Black pawn structure!} cxd5 $15 {All of a sudden Black
now has a protected passed pawn on d5, whereas White’s majority on the queen
side due to the doubled pawns represent no danger. On top of that, the c6
square has become available for the black king. Magnus got his chance and does
not let go anymore.} 33. b5 $6 {Trying to resolve his doubled pawns and make
his majority healthy again. But after the trade doesn’t Black have a double
attack with his new born king?!} (33. Kb3 {was a better try.}) 33… axb5 34.
Nxb5+ Kc6 35. Nd6 Nf3 {But he must have missed this counterattack against e5.}
(35… Kxc5 $4 36. Nxb7+ {This is why Caruana must have thought that b4-b5 was
still fine.}) (35… Rf3 $1 {with the threat of Rdf8 to take over the f-file,
was also very strong.} 36. Rxf3 Nxf3 37. Rf1 Nxe5 $17) 36. b4 Ra8 $1 {Magnus
shows great restraint. Before taking the pawn, he first activates his rook.} (
36… Nxe5 $2 37. Rfe1 $1 {attacking both Ne5 and e6.} Nf7 (37… Rf2+ 38. Kc3
Rf3+ 39. Kb2 Rf2+ 40. Kc3 Rf3+ $10) 38. b5+ Kc7 39. Nxf7 Rxf7 40. Rxe6 $14) 37.
Ra1 $2 {In time trouble it goes downhill for Caruana.} ({Toughest was the
difficult} 37. Nf5 Nxe5 (37… exf5 $2 38. Rxf3 $10) 38. Nxg7 Kd7 $17) 37…
Rxa1 38. Rxa1 Nxe5 39. Ra7 (39. Re1 Nf3 $1 {is the pointe.} 40. Rxe6 $4 Nd4+
$19) 39… Rb8 $17 {Black has a large advantage now and is practically winning
with his coordinated army and connected passed pawns.} (39… b6 {is also fine.
}) 40. Ra3 $2 {Typical time trouble move. After this mistake there is no more
doubt as to the outcome of the game.} (40. Kc3 {activating the king} Nxg4 41.
Kd3 {still provided a modicum of defensive possibilities.}) 40… b6 $19 {
Still battling against White’s “strong” structure.} 41. Ra7 (41. Kc3) 41…
bxc5 42. Ra6+ Kc7 43. bxc5 Nd7 44. Ra7+ Kc6 45. g5 Nxc5 46. Nf7 d4 47. Ne5+ Kd5
48. Nd7 d3+ 49. Kc1 Nxd7 50. Rxd7+ Ke4 {and Caruana resigned. A typical
Carlsen victory.} 0-1
[/pgn_compat]

Considering their head to head count and their last encounters in 2014, I don’t think that Caruana is going to hurt Carlsen during the Sinquefield Cup.

To be continued…

 

Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (2): Can Aronian Beat Carlsen?

In a previous article Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (1): Can Anybody Beat Magnus Carlsen?, I discussed the possibility of Carlsen being his own worst opponent. In this follow-up I want to take a look at the number two on the starting list, Levon Aronian.

Statistics

In the database I found 48 encounters in classical chess between Magnus Carlsen and Levon Aronian. In the head to head Aronian is only a very slight underdog, he scores 47,9%.

Last Encounter

The last encounter in a classical game between the two was during the Olympiad in Tromso earlier this year. I will annotate the game below.

Click on the moves below to start playing and show a chess board:

[pgn_compat]
[Event “Chess Olympiad”]
[Site “Tromso NOR”]
[Date “2014.08.06”]
[Round “5.3”]
[White “Levon Aronian”]
[Black “Magnus Carlsen”]
[Result “1/2-1/2”]
[ECO “D16”]
[WhiteElo “2805”]
[BlackElo “2877”]
[Annotator “Waldemar Moes, Better Your Chess”]
[PlyCount “116”]
[EventDate “2014.08.02”]
[SourceDate “2014.04.06”]

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 dxc4 {Magnus plays the “proper” Slav.} 5.
a4 Na6 $5 {and quickly goes for unchartered territory. The move he chooses is
provocative. It does not stop e4 and puts a knight on the rim. On the flip
side is does aim at the weak b4 square.} (5… Bf5 {to control e4 is the main
line.}) 6. e3 $5 {Funny how Magnus’ opponents seem to feel the need to return
the favor by not playing the most principled move. Obviously now Magnus’ plans
have a better chance of succeeding.} (6. e4 $14 {is the most popular move, and
should give White a nice edge.}) 6… Bg4 $5 {Again a slightly more ambitious
move.} (6… Be6 7. Ne5 Nb4 8. Bxc4 Bxc4 9. Nxc4 e6 $10) 7. Bxc4 e6 8. h3 Bxf3
$6 {This is not the first time that I see Magnus give up both his center and
his bishop pair. Something similar happened in his game against Caruana, where
he played the Scandinavian, got in to trouble (logically) but managed to
outwit Caruana in the end game and win. It seems that his style off late is
that of a “provocateur” and “teaser” ;-)} (8… Bh5 {is of course a more
classical approach.}) 9. Qxf3 Nb4 10. O-O Be7 11. a5 {Gaining space on the
queen side and disallowing a7-a5, which would solidly anchor the knight on b4.
For now though this knight can always go to d5 and it is difficult for White
to control d5 with e3-e4, since that would drop the d4 pawn.} O-O 12. Rd1 $14 {
OK, this is the moment for a commentator to write something as follows: “The
opening has more or less finished and White has come out on top. He has more
central control and the pair of the bishops. On the flip side Black has easy
development and no weaknesses.” But what does that mean?! Especially the last
bit: “Black has no weaknesses”. Does it mean that right now White has no
obvious target to attack and should therefore not devise an attacking plan,
but a more strategic plan? But is it true, is Black free from weaknesses? You
could say that he has a weakness in the center, because of his pawn minority
over there and that he is also weak on the light squares, because he lacks
this bishop. So, White should do the following: fully emply all pieces to
support pawn expansion in the center (using his majority) and open up the
position for the pair of bishops, preferable by using a break on the light
squares, where White has the upper hand. Now, let’s follow Aronian, will he
manage to play e3-e4 and d4-d5 at some stage? Or will he choose to use the
center with e3-e4-e5 and try for a light squared attack along the b1-h7
diagonal?} b6 {Magnus tries to do something back on the queen side by
attacking the cramping pawn on a5.} 13. axb6 $6 {This move is of course not a
mistake, but is does trade and releases some of the tension.} ({More ambitious
is:} 13. Bb3 $5 {to prepare e4} bxa5 14. e4 $14) (13. e4 $2 Nc2 {hitting Ra1
and d4}) 13… axb6 14. Rxa8 Qxa8 {The whole queen side transaction has been
favorable for Black. He has managed to trade a pair of rooks (one less white
rook that could get active through the center), he has managed to trade of a
pair of pawns (less pawns to capture for Aronian) may have active
possibilities down the a-file for his queen, and can move his king’s rook to
the center. Not bad.} 15. Bd2 $6 {I’m not sure why Aronian plays this move,
apart from protecting a1. But Qa1 was not a threat. On d2 the bishop blocks
the the rook and loses time to set things in motion before Black does.} (15. e4
{I like this logical move best. The bishop on c1 is fine for now. It may go
the king side in one go later. It is also not likely to be pinned by Qa1,
since Rd1 is well protected and there may be a discovered attack with the
bishop in that case.} c5 $6 16. d5 $1 {is exactly the type of play that White
is angling for.}) 15… Rd8 {Carlsen decides to keep just that tiny little
more play in the position.} (15… c5 {Carlsen could even have considered
exchanging a flank pawn for a center pawn, thereby restoring the equilibrium
in the center.} 16. Qxa8 (16. d5 $2 {is not possible without a pawn on e4 to
support it!}) 16… Rxa8 {and the position is heading for a draw.}) 16. Rc1 {
White has lost the small window of opportunity he had and now makes a move
just because he has to. He no longer has a tangible advantage to work with.}
Nbd5 {Maybe inspired by Aronian’s insipid play, Carlsen does not go for the
nullifying pawn break.} (16… c5 $10) 17. Qd1 h6 (17… c5) 18. Ra1 Qb7 {Both
players dance around a bit.} 19. Qb3 Ra8 {Magnus has enough, it seems.} 20. Rc1
{No thank you, says Levon. What you can do, I can do too.} Nxc3 {Come on,
let’s start exchanging.} 21. Bxc3 {OK, but now my bishop is on the long
diagonal!} Qc7 (21… c5 $2 {is no longer possible.} 22. dxc5 Bxc5 23. Bxf6
gxf6 24. Bxe6 $1 fxe6 25. Rxc5 $16) 22. Be2 {Aronian finds a new target: pawn
c6. And if this pawn tries to move of the light square it allows for d4xc5
which opens up Bc3. White’s position seems to have some prospects again.} c5 {
Magnus has the guts to play this move anyway, rightly thinking that he can
keep everything under control.} 23. Bf3 Rd8 24. Rd1 (24. dxc5 bxc5 {and Bc3
can do no harm on the long diagonal.}) 24… Nd5 {Probably Magnus had enough
and already envisaged the endgame} ({Good was also to interpose a trade on d4
first:} 24… cxd4 25. Bxd4 Nd5 (25… e5 $6 {weakens light squares})) 25. dxc5
{opening up and preparing to capture on d5 three times, winning a pawn.} Nxc3 {
Magnus forces the issue, but with an in-between move White still maintains
some pull in the endgame.} (25… Qxc5 {was probably fine, but allows White to
save his bishop pair:} 26. Be5 $14) (25… Bxc5 $2 26. Bxd5 Rxd5 27. Rxd5 exd5
28. Qxd5 $16 {and White is a pawn up.}) (25… bxc5 $2 26. Bxd5 $16 {again
winning a pawn.}) 26. cxb6 Rxd1+ 27. Bxd1 Qb7 28. bxc3 Bc5 {This is the point
of Magnus’ play: he wants to hold the endgame with opposite color bishops a
pawn down and is up to the task.} 29. h4 Qxb6 30. Qc2 {Of course Aronian keeps
the queens on the board, but is unable to make headway in the remainder of the
game.} Qd6 31. h5 Kf8 32. Bf3 Ke7 33. g3 Qe5 34. Kg2 Qd6 35. Qe4 Qc7 36. Be2
Qd6 37. Bc4 Qc7 38. Bb5 Bd6 39. c4 Bc5 40. g4 Bb6 41. Qa8 Qd8 42. Qa1 Kf8 43.
Qa3+ Kg8 44. Bc6 Qc8 45. Qa4 Bc5 46. Qb5 Be7 47. Kf3 Qd8 48. Ke2 Qd6 49. Qb7
Qb4 50. Qc8+ Bf8 51. Be4 Qc5 52. Qa6 Qg5 53. Bf3 g6 54. hxg6 Qxg6 55. Qa4 Qb1
56. Bg2 Qb2+ 57. Kf1 Qb1+ 58. Ke2 Qb2+ {And draw agreed. An uneventful
encounter. Let’s hope that their encounters at the Sinquefield Cup will bring
more entertainment.} 1/2-1/2
[/pgn_compat]

Considering their head to head count and their last encounter, I don’t think that Aronian is going to hurt Carlsen during the Sinquefield Cup.

To be continued…

Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (1): Can Anybody Beat Magnus Carlsen?

From Tuesday the 26th of August till Tuesday the 9th of September 2014, the second Sinquefield Cup will take place at the STL Chess Club & Scholastic Center in St. Louis, Missouri. The tournament is named after Rex Sinquefield, founder of the STL Chess Club & Scholastic Center, and one of the people that was on Garry Kasparov’s ticket for the FIDE Presidential Elections that were held earlier this August during the Chess Olympiad in Tromso, Norway.

Whereas last year’s tournament had only four participants (Magnus Carlsen, Levon Aronian, Hikaru Nakamura and Gata Kamsky), this year’s edition has six participants:

participants-sinquefield-cup-2014

 

As IGM Yasser Seirawan remarked during a recent training session, it is going to be the strongest event in the history of chess with an average rating of 2802(!), putting the tournament in the unprecedented category of 23! Seirawan also remarked that no single player of Russian origin is playing, hinting at the rise of international chess. Maybe we will live to see the days of a Russia against the Rest Of The World chess match again sometime? It must be said that initially Sergey Karjakin was invited, but was replaced – apparently due to visa troubles – by goalgetter Maxime Vachier-Lagrave from France.

Continue reading Previewing The Sinquefield Cup (1): Can Anybody Beat Magnus Carlsen?

Exclusive Training With Yasser Seirawan

Yesterday Sunday the 17th, together with a few club colleagues, I was fortunate enough to attend an exclusive training session with world renowned Chess Grandmaster Yasser Seirawan.

We visited Yasser in his house in Amsterdam which has been been his main stead for a number of years now, traveling back and forth between the U.S and The Netherlands. We received a warm welcome with coffee and tea and Yasser showed us some of the books he has published in earlier years such as “No Regrets” about the return match between Fischer and Spassky in 1992.

The subject of the training was:

Playing the Caro-Kann defense from the Black point of view.

Yasser started with pointing out that there are basically two ways to combat 1.e4:

  1. playing to attack and eliminate (or move) the pawn on e4 (Aljechin defense, Scandinavian, Open Spanish, Russian defense, French defense and the Caro-Kann defense)
  2. playing around the pawn on e4 (mainly Sicilian and Closed Spanish and to some extend the Pirc and modern defenses)

Yasser has always been a staunch advocate of the first method and during his career he slowly gravitated from his early favorite the Aljechin defense (against which White in his opinion has never really shown a clear way to achieve an advantage) via the French (with often a bad bishop on c8) to the Caro-Kann defense (which has a slight delay in counterattacking the center, but has no bad light squared bishop). Throughout the years, the Caro-Kann has remained one of his most trusted weapons, so in this respect it was only natural we would consult him to share some secrets with us.

Out of the many ways in which White can combat the Caro-Kann Yasser summarized:

  • 1.e4 c6 2.c4 d5 – where White trades twice on d5 and holds back his d-pawn
  • 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.cxd5 cxd5 4.c4 – the Panov Attack normally leading to complex isolated queen pawn positions
  • 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Pc3/Pd2 dxe4 4.Pxe4 Nd7/Bf5 – the classical Karpov and Capablanca methods
  • 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.f3 – the “Fantasy” variation
  • 1.e4 c6 2.d3 d5 3.Nbd2 – King’s Indian Attack
  • 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 – the Advance variation or as tongue-in-cheek dubbed by Yasser himself: “the Short defense”

It is the last system (the Advance variation) that we spent the most time on, especially since nowadays it is the most popular way to combat the Caro-Kann. Yasser sketched out some history on the line and also shared some of his currently preferred methods on how to play this line.

Throughout the session Yasser gaves us a few tips & pointers as to how to study the openings:

  • Always check at least three things – his Golden Rules so to speak – and religiously repeat this during the first phase of the game:
    1. Do I have my fair share of the center?
    2. Do I have effective development?
    3. Is my king safe?
  • before or during the transition to the middle game ask yourself if you like the position you are about to play and if you feel it is trustworthy
  • while exploring a variation, use an opening book reflecting the popularity of certain moves and check them with an engine running in the background. Always be critical of certain moves and also wonder if you can play more ambitiously at certain moments
  • Have so-called “guides” (world renowned specialists on certain openings) that you can turn to when faced with a difficult opening problem, f.i. Kasparov for the Najdorf, Svidler for the Grunfeld and Karpov for Isolated Queen Pawn positions.

When asked about the White systems against the Caro-Kann he and the black playing community had feared the most during his career he said that he had basically figured them all out, but pointed out a few hick-ups along the way:

  • 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Bf5 5.Ng3 Bg6 6.h4 h6 7.Nh3!? when White is trying to bring about a lot of pressure on e6. But some sample games of Botwinnik had saved the day for him
  • 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nd7 5.Ng5 Ngf6 6.Bd3 e6
    7.N1f3 h6 8.Nxe6 (Kasparov’s infamous loss against Deep Blue in 1997)
  • 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nd7 5.Ng5 h6 6.Ne6 Qa5+
    7.Bd2 Qb6 8.Bd3 fxe6 9.Qh5+ Kd8 10.Ba5 (Nunn – Georgiev, Linares 1998)

Most enjoyable about Yasser is that he is a man full of stories and anekdotes of which he shared a number with us. At a certain moment we felt we even had to cut his enthousiasm short, because we had already taken up so much of his precious time 😉

Today Yasser is travelling to Saint Louis, Missouri, to be a commentator at the second Sinquefield Cup. He pointed out something noteworthy: it is going to be the strongest tournament in history, and that without the participation of a single Russian Grandmaster. Personally I’m looking forward to him doing the live commentary again, I’m guessing with co-commentators Jennifer Shahade and Maurice Ashley.

After saying goodbye to Yasser we ended the day with a pint of beer and some blitz chess in chess cafe “De Laurierboom” in the center of Amsterdam.

All in all, it was an occasion to be remembered and maybe even to be repeated!
Many thanks to Dirk Goes for initiating and organizing!

From left to right: Yasser Seirawan, Hing Ting Lai, Nabil Kania and myself
From left to right: Yasser Seirawan, Hing Ting Lai, Nabil Kania and myself
Yasser and Hing Ting at work
Yasser and Hing Ting at work

 

 

Sign Up And Earn A Free Video Analysis Lesson Of One Of Your Own Games

_ABF3528-200-200Dear all,

Until and including July the 10th, we will be taking new membership registrations again. If you are a chess enthousiast aspiring to improve your chess, then sign up during this period and by way of bonus I will offer you a free video analysis lesson of a game of your choice!

The free video analysis lesson:

  • …is worth about USD 40,= (EUR 30,=)
  • …will last about one hour
  • …will contain useful feedback on the opening, middle game, end game and mistakes as well as tips & tricks
  • …will be made available to you via a personalized download link

Continue reading Sign Up And Earn A Free Video Analysis Lesson Of One Of Your Own Games

Carlsen Is The New World Blitz Chess Champion!

_ABF3400-200-200Magnus Carlsen is the new World Blitz Chess Champion. On the second day of the tournament in Dubai he scored 8 points out 10 games, making a total of 17 out of 21!

Carlsen went into the second day with half a point lead, but things were not so easy, especially since Ian Nepomniachtchi was on a roll today starting with six wins in a row(!) and Carlsen only drawing against such cracks as Anand, Aronian, Morozevich and Grischuk. This even meant that after the 16th round Nepo had taken over the lead by half a point.

In round 17 Nepo and Carlsen beat Yudin and Dreev respectively keeping Nepo in the lead. Also in round 18 the standings did not change when both matadors drew their games against Mamedov and Morozevich. But after round 19 Carlsen had leveled the field again by beating Mamedov when Nepo only drew against Korobov. All was to be decided in the last two rounds!

Continue reading Carlsen Is The New World Blitz Chess Champion!